Corrections

zerodayroom is committed to accuracy. When an error is identified in our reference pages, our policy is to correct it transparently rather than delete the content. A substantively corrected article will carry a note at its foot stating ‘Updated on [date]’ with a brief explanation of the amendment. This applies to factual inaccuracies, such as an incorrect vulnerability identifier, a mistaken attribution of a campaign, or an erroneous technical detail about a control. Minor typographical errors or grammatical fixes that do not alter factual meaning are made without a correction note.

A substantive correction is required when the stated fact about a vulnerability, threat actor, control, or other core topic is wrong. This includes inaccuracies in dates, version numbers, technical mechanisms, or regulatory status. Readers can report a suspected error by contacting us with the full article address and quoting the exact claim they believe to be incorrect, along with any supporting information. We aim to investigate and, where necessary, implement a correction within two working days.

The facts documented on zerodayroom are sometimes superseded by real-world changes, such as a vulnerability being renamed, a threat actor adopting new tactics, or a regulation being updated. In these cases, the reference page is amended to reflect the new reality, and the previous information is either removed or historically contextualised with a correction note. The goal is to maintain each page as a current, accurate snapshot.

This corrections process applies across all sections of the site, from Vulnerabilities and Threats to Defence, Regulation, and Vendors. It ensures the platform remains a reliable technical resource for the cybersecurity community in Asia and beyond. We rely on our expert readership to help maintain this standard of precision.